
Cuomo, as the state's attorney general, believes that he has standing because taxpayers' money was used to grease the merger. He also raises a second, more troubling issue: that material financial information may have been withheld from Bank of America shareholders when they met on December 5 to approve the merger. They voted with knowledge neither of the coming bonuses nor of Merrill's stupendous fourth-quarter loss. Such a lack of disclosure would be a violation of New York securities laws.
President Barack Obama calls the bonuses "shameful," and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT) promises his own investigation. But they have themselves to blame as well, having pushed all along for a federal bailout of the banking industry. This is what happens when you let foxes into the hen-house. Bank of America alone has benefitted from $45 billion in cash infusions and another $118 billion in loan guarantees. Now it looks like some of that dough will be spent in litigation. And if the Treasury officials who masterminded the BofA-Merrill merger are somehow implicated in the cover-up of pertinent financial information, who knows what the eventual price tag for taxpayers will be?

1 comment:
Aint it the little things that trip
us up after we take a stand?
Looks like it's the gang mentality
behind the recent republican voting
pattern, circling the wagons.
They're so busy changing faces, it's hard to decide which one is real.
Post a Comment